Ferdy on Films, etc.

Film reviews and commentary, random thoughts on the world around us, blatant promotion of favorite charities, and other ponderables.

The Spirit of Ed Wood Blogathon

Babes%204.jpg

Babes in Arms (1939)
Director: Busby Berkeley

By Marilyn Ferdinand

Hey, kids, let’s read a review!

When Greg at Cinema Styles decided to throw a Spirit of Ed Wood blogathon, I had to do a lot of thinking. I tried to distill the essence of Wood in my mind to try to find a kindred spirit out there who displays those characteristics that make Ed Wood Ed Wood, who might even have been an inspiration to the indomitable Eddie. You know what I’m talking about—production values that are so dazzlingly bad they’re good, a script only a mother could love, and a dogged determination to look at the whole sow’s ear and proclaim it the finest, pearl-beaded silk purse ever to have been Made in Japan. And, although I admit that he doesn’t spring immediately to mind, I finally resolved that were Ed Wood alive today, he’d have evolved his movie-making to emulate perhaps the greatest purveyor of fantasmagoria ever to haunt a sound stage, Busby Berkeley.

Berkeley is best known today for his kaleidoscopic dance numbers of gargantuan proportions—true mutants that push the movie musical into the scifi country where Ed Wood hung his hat. When Berkeley worked his impossible-dream magic, his penchant for cheesy-looking floating heads, bubble-blowing mermaids, and deconstructed musical instruments swelled to accommodate a recital by King Kong made for a bit of hair-raising suspense. Was the Big Monkey going to show up and pull a few bananas out of Carmen Miranda’s 40-foot-wide fruit tiara?

Babes%209.jpg

The Berkeley film that screams Ed Wood to me is Babes in Arms, a 1939 Mickey Rooney-Judy Garland musical that captures all the enthusiasm of those crazy kids—Berkeley and Wood—who just wanted to make good in show business. I think Henry Hill as a Broadway producer named Maddox and Rooney as Mickey Moran, a young ham suffocating in greasepaint, said it best:

Moran: We’re going to make good for him, too.
Maddox: Yes, and you’re going to make good for a lot of other people.
Moran: Who?
Maddox: For the millions of kids who never had a chance. For the millions of kids without a wiseacre who’s telling them there’s no such thing as an American dream. Well, those kids have got their eyes on you because you’re being given your chance. And, by the Bones of Bacchus, you’d better make good.
Moran: Gee, it’s bigger than just a show. Say, it’s everybody in the country.

And everybody in the country was looking forward to beating up Hitler and Mussolini for destroying the economy, which “God’s Country,” the closing number of this musical, reveals to be Berkeley’s purpose all along.

Babes%203a.JPG

At first, the film looks like the usual younger vs. older generation story, pitting established vaudevillians against the swinging new guard who just happen to be their children. Mickey and Patsy Barton (Garland) are sweethearts who are trying to break into show biz to help their parents, whose prosperity in vaudeville has vanished with the defection of their audiences to talking pictures. While the old timers, led by Mickey’s pop Joe Moran (Charles Winninger), try to revive vaudeville with a tour, Mickey decides to write and produce his kind of show. He fires up all the other vaudeville kids who live in his town—a haven for show people thanks to Judge Black (Guy Kibbee), who fends off Elmira Gulch, I mean, Martha Steele (Margaret Hamilton) from placing the kids in a home—and they march around the crummy-looking set to the rocket-launching “Babes in Arms,” gather wood, and build a bonfire.

Rehearsals hit a snag when Don Brice (Douglas McPhail) and Moran’s sister Molly (Betty Jaynes, McPhail’s wife) don’t put enough feeling into their love duet “Where or When.” Brice blames the suspended canoe Mickey’s put them in, but when they get out of it, it’s plain that this operatic duo can’t loosen up. It’s actually painful to watch Jaynes form her tones with a mouth so tight she looks about ready to pop. Berkeley, in his wisdom, sees no reason to do anything but shoot her close-up, full face—no flattering angles for him, no sir. A pint-sized orchestra provides scratchy-toned comedy for this touching scene.

Babes%201.jpg

Patsy and Mickey’s love is tested when an angel for the show comes to the rescue—on condition she gets to play the lead reserved for Patsy. Baby Rosalie Essex (June Preisser) is looking for a comeback project and thinks this is it. Preisser is really quite funny as a Shirley Temple knockoff, pampered but not spoiled the way the script seems to suggest she should be. Mickey’s all business, but a stage kiss he gives Baby sends Patsy packing to see her mother on the road; at least, we get to hear Garland sing the beautiful “I Cried for You” in compensation for this lame lover’s quarrel.

Babes%2011.jpg

Mickey’s show goes on as scheduled (with an adult orchestra; I guess the munchkins had a shooting conflict on The Wizard of Oz set) and a Broadway producer shows up to see what the young turks of entertainment have to offer. He gets a minstrel show. I simply have no comment about that, but then, I don’t need one. The script offers up a hurricane to stop the show. I can see Berkeley putting on his angora sweater and spinning the over-the-top opera La Gioconda in his trailer right about now.

After his reverie, Berkeley remembers he has to tie up the loose ends. Of course, the Broadway producer wants to put the show on, and Patsy gets to play the lead after all. The vaudevillians give up the ghost to the future and everyone feels good about America. The end.

I think Berkeley was watching Oz being filmed while he tinkered with the script. Garland has that same scream of concern (“oOH! oOH!”) when Mickey faints that she has numerous times when her companions on the Yellow Brick Road run into difficulties. She picks flowers just like Dorothy Gale picked poppies. There are munchkins, a wicked “witch” played by Margaret Hamilton, and a hurricane in place of a twister. And all the money that was poured into Oz meant there was nothing left for Berkeley. This is the cheapest-looking MGM musical I’ve ever seen, making it impossible for Berkeley to fully realize his dreams, which I’m sure included making the bonfire outshine the burning of Atlanta and a minstrel show that would have had 1,000 pickaninnies in a vast field of cotton and Judy Garland singing atop a cotton gin.

But in the true spirit of Ed Wood, Berkeley works with what he has (including deadly lyrics by Arthur Freed) and creates something so offensively bad, it’s compulsively watchable. Hi dee ho! l

11 Comments:

  • At July 7, 2009 12:26 PM, Greg said…

    Rooney as Mickey Moran, a young ham suffocating in greasepaint,

    Yeah, that's Rooney, pretty much throughout his career. And the number in blackface - Ouch! I remember seeing this for the first time a few years ago and just being stunned. I haven't seen it since but I salute you Marilyn for putting this up. It would have never crossed my mind but after recalling it and reading your review it's a perfect fit.

    And thank you for being so kind as to contribute. You're a friend.

  • At July 7, 2009 12:32 PM, Marilyn said…

    What gets me about the minstrel number is that the "kids" were trying to show that they had a new and different approach to entertainment that was going to appeal the way vaudeville no longer could. It's so, um, retro in a bad way.

    Thanks for giving me the opportunity to play, Greg. This was a lot of fun, and having run a blogathon, I know how much work it is. So thanks for hosting.

  • At July 7, 2009 10:10 PM, fox said…

    Ahhh... if were still so easy as to just blame Hitler and Mussolini for a poor economy these days. It would make things so much easier on politicians and bankers! :)

    I loved this post Marilyn. OK, whip me for saying it (though I think Ed Wood would be ok with it) but you were really thinking outside the box with this one.

    And "a script only a mother could love" is a great line. I would love to use that in a review someday, but, of course, I would give you credit for that.

  • At July 7, 2009 10:42 PM, Marilyn said…

    Thanks, Fox. I'm really not that familiar with Ed Wood's oeuvre, so when Greg put out the challenge, I never considered doing an Ed Wood film. It seems I'm quite in the minority on that decision, which is fine because I've learned so much about him from the great entries in this blogathon.

  • At July 8, 2009 1:17 PM, Mykal Banta said…

    Marilyn: Very, very well thought out post and very interesting Wood analogy to the work of Berkeley. Hell, you had me from that first, wonderful line: "Hey Kids . . " which somehow captures the enthusiasm of both film-makers.

    I had never thought about it (which is what makes this post so fine), but Berkeley and Wood certainly share a sort of sensational, can-do spirit. Ed Wood seemed to enjoy a good minstrel show as well, plopping one smack dab in the middle of Jailbait for absolutely no apparent reason.

    Great post and very thought provoking. I am sure Ed Wood would have been flattered at the comparison. -- Mykal

  • At July 8, 2009 1:33 PM, Marilyn said…

    Mykal - I'm honored. Your post for the blogathon has me kneeling in supplication. I thought you put a lot of great insight and feeling into your beautifully written post. I'm glad you enjoyed my humble offering.

  • At July 8, 2009 4:14 PM, Greg F said…

    I never considered doing an Ed Wood film. It seems I'm quite in the minority on that decision.

    Yes, that's true. You and Ed, who is doing daily posts on Jack Arnold, are the only two to do Non-Ed Wood movies and I'm so glad you two did. I'd love to see more people delve into other titles as well.

  • At July 8, 2009 5:08 PM, Marilyn said…

    I actually considered doing Little Fugitives by Morris Engel. He just went out with a simple script and shot a film on Coney Island that's absolutely wonderful. Not Ed Wood in the sense of being a "bad" film - quite the contrary - but it has the same attitude of "I'm going to do this because I want to." Still, I didn't want anyone to think Little Fugitives is a bad film, so I went with Babes in Arms.

  • At July 9, 2009 8:05 PM, Jandy said…

    I've got to admit, I started to outcry a little bit when I saw you were going to compare Berkeley to Ed Wood, but once I saw your argument (and once my little-girl nostalgic tender spot for Berkeley musicals squared up with my grown-up enjoyment of cult films), I'm on board. Really interesting and unusual approach to the blogathon (which I'm only now starting to catch up on).

    I just rewatched 42nd Street and Gold Diggers of 1933 and again reveled in Berkeley's insane musical direction - of course, he didn't actually direct those in full. Still.

Post a comment